Can a AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB run Halo Infinite?
The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB handles Halo Infinite comfortably — roughly 76 FPS at 1080p and 47 FPS at 1440p on high settings.
High preset, upscaling off, paired with a AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D-class processor.
How the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB measures up
| Requirement | AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB | Minimum | Recommended | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPU performance score | 34 | 9 | 27 | Recommended |
| Video memory | 16 GB | 4 GB | 8 GB | Recommended |
| Ray tracing | ✓ Supported | Game has no RT | N/A | |
| Upscaling | FSR | Not supported | N/A | |
Recommended settings
For 60 FPS at 1080p
Use the high preset. You already clear 60 FPS on high, so this leaves headroom for dips in busy scenes.
At 1440p
Around 47 FPS on high. Playable, but drop to medium or enable upscaling for a stable 60.
At 4K
Around 28 FPS — not a realistic target for this pairing.
How other cards handle Halo Infinite
| Graphics card | Tier | 1080p FPS | vs AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT | B | 86 | ▲ 10 FPS | Compare |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | B | 79 | ▲ 3 FPS | Compare |
| AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT | B | 79 | ▲ 3 FPS | Compare |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop | B | 76 | ▼ 0 FPS | Compare |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | B | 76 | ▼ 0 FPS | Compare |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER | B | 76 | ▼ 0 FPS | Compare |
Frequently asked questions
Can the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB run Halo Infinite?
The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB handles Halo Infinite comfortably — roughly 76 FPS at 1080p and 47 FPS at 1440p on high settings.
What FPS will I get?
On high settings with upscaling off: roughly 76 FPS at 1080p, 47 FPS at 1440p and 28 FPS at 4K. These are modelled estimates — see our methodology.
What settings should I use?
Start at the high preset at 1080p.
Will my processor hold this back?
These figures assume a processor fast enough not to limit the card. If yours is older, run the bottleneck calculator — this title leans on the GPU, so a modest CPU deficit costs less.