Can a Intel Arc A770 16GB run Monster Hunter Wilds?

Yes — runs well

The Intel Arc A770 16GB handles Monster Hunter Wilds comfortably — roughly 68 FPS at 1080p and 42 FPS at 1440p on high settings.

68FPS @ 1080p
42FPS @ 1440p
25FPS @ 4K

High preset, upscaling off, paired with a AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D-class processor.

How the Intel Arc A770 16GB measures up

RequirementIntel Arc A770 16GBMinimumRecommendedResult
GPU performance score 26 16 23 Recommended
Video memory 16 GB 6 GB 8 GB Recommended
Ray tracing ✓ Supported Game supports RT (medium) Available
Upscaling FSR, XeSS DLSS, FSR Available

Recommended settings

For 60 FPS at 1080p

Use the high preset. You already clear 60 FPS on high, so this leaves headroom for dips in busy scenes.

At 1440p

Around 42 FPS on high. Playable, but drop to medium or enable upscaling for a stable 60.

At 4K

Around 25 FPS — not a realistic target for this pairing.

Upscaling

Monster Hunter Wilds supports DLSS and FSR. Your card supports FSR — Quality mode is worth 25–40% more frames. Compare upscalers.

How other cards handle Monster Hunter Wilds

Graphics cardTier1080p FPSvs Intel Arc A770 16GB
AMD Radeon RX 5700 C 71 ▲ 3 FPS Compare
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER C 68 ▼ 0 FPS Compare
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop C 68 ▼ 0 FPS Compare
Intel Arc B570 C 68 ▼ 0 FPS Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 C 65 ▼ 3 FPS Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 C 65 ▼ 3 FPS Compare

Frequently asked questions

Can the Intel Arc A770 16GB run Monster Hunter Wilds?

The Intel Arc A770 16GB handles Monster Hunter Wilds comfortably — roughly 68 FPS at 1080p and 42 FPS at 1440p on high settings.

What FPS will I get?

On high settings with upscaling off: roughly 68 FPS at 1080p, 42 FPS at 1440p and 25 FPS at 4K. These are modelled estimates — see our methodology.

What settings should I use?

Start at the high preset at 1080p. Then enable upscaling on Quality mode before lowering anything further.

Will my processor hold this back?

These figures assume a processor fast enough not to limit the card. If yours is older, run the bottleneck calculator — this title is unusually CPU-heavy, so it matters more than usual here.