Can a NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti run Palworld?

Yes — comfortably

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti handles Palworld comfortably — roughly 100 FPS at 1080p and 62 FPS at 1440p on high settings.

100FPS @ 1080p
62FPS @ 1440p
36FPS @ 4K

High preset, upscaling off, paired with a AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D-class processor.

How the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti measures up

RequirementNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 TiMinimumRecommendedResult
GPU performance score 57 17 35 Recommended
Video memory 24 GB 6 GB 8 GB Recommended
Ray tracing ✓ Supported Game has no RT N/A
Upscaling DLSS, FSR DLSS, FSR Available

Recommended settings

For 60 FPS at 1080p

Use the ultra preset. You already clear 60 FPS on high, so this leaves headroom for dips in busy scenes.

At 1440p

Comfortable — around 62 FPS on high.

At 4K

Around 36 FPS. Workable with upscaling on Performance mode.

Upscaling

Palworld supports DLSS and FSR. Your card supports DLSS — Quality mode is the best first change you can make. Compare upscalers.

How other cards handle Palworld

Graphics cardTier1080p FPSvs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti A 106 ▲ 6 FPS Compare
AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT A 106 ▲ 6 FPS Compare
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT A 104 ▲ 4 FPS Compare
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER A 102 ▲ 2 FPS Compare
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT A 96 ▼ 4 FPS Compare
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti A 96 ▼ 4 FPS Compare

Frequently asked questions

Can the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti run Palworld?

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti handles Palworld comfortably — roughly 100 FPS at 1080p and 62 FPS at 1440p on high settings.

What FPS will I get?

On high settings with upscaling off: roughly 100 FPS at 1080p, 62 FPS at 1440p and 36 FPS at 4K. These are modelled estimates — see our methodology.

What settings should I use?

Start at the ultra preset at 1080p. Then enable upscaling on Quality mode before lowering anything further.

Will my processor hold this back?

These figures assume a processor fast enough not to limit the card. If yours is older, run the bottleneck calculator — this title is unusually CPU-heavy, so it matters more than usual here.