
Can a NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 run Tree of Savior (English Ver.)?
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 handles Tree of Savior (English Ver.) comfortably — roughly 1836 FPS at 1080p and 1138 FPS at 1440p on high settings.
High preset, upscaling off, paired with a AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D-class processor.
How the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 measures up
| Requirement | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 | Minimum | Recommended | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPU performance score | 26 | Recommended | ||
| Video memory | 8 GB | GB | GB | Recommended |
| Ray tracing | ✓ Supported | Game has no RT | N/A | |
| Upscaling | DLSS, FSR | Not supported | N/A | |
Recommended settings
For 60 FPS at 1080p
Use the ultra preset. You already clear 60 FPS on high, so this leaves headroom for dips in busy scenes.
At 1440p
Comfortable — around 1138 FPS on high.
At 4K
Around 661 FPS on high — genuinely viable.
How other cards handle Tree of Savior (English Ver.)
| Graphics card | Tier | 1080p FPS | vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | C | 1910 | ▲ 74 FPS | Compare |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 | C | 1910 | ▲ 74 FPS | Compare |
| AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT | C | 1910 | ▲ 74 FPS | Compare |
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 | C | 1910 | ▲ 74 FPS | Compare |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER | C | 1836 | ▼ 0 FPS | Compare |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop | C | 1836 | ▼ 0 FPS | Compare |
Frequently asked questions
Can the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 run Tree of Savior (English Ver.)?
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 handles Tree of Savior (English Ver.) comfortably — roughly 1836 FPS at 1080p and 1138 FPS at 1440p on high settings.
What FPS will I get?
On high settings with upscaling off: roughly 1836 FPS at 1080p, 1138 FPS at 1440p and 661 FPS at 4K. These are modelled estimates — see our methodology.
What settings should I use?
Start at the ultra preset at 1080p.
Will my processor hold this back?
These figures assume a processor fast enough not to limit the card. If yours is older, run the bottleneck calculator — this title leans on the GPU, so a modest CPU deficit costs less.